[Event "Nottingham Tournament"] [Site "Nottingham England"] [Date "1936.08.11"] [Round "1"] [White "Alekhine, Alexander"] [Black "Flohr, Salo"] [PlyCount "113"] [Result "1-0"] 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Bd2 {A "lapsus manus." I intended to play 4. e5 and f4 as, for instance, against Nimzovitch at San Remo 1930, but instead I made the move with the Bishop first.} 4... dxe4 5. Nc3xe4 {5.Nc3xe4? After 5. Qg4 Qxd4 6. Nf3 or 5. ... Nf6 6. Qxg7 Rg8 7. Qh6 Qxd4 etc., White, as I have pointed out already in "My Best Games of Chess," would obtain a sufficient positional equivalent for the Pawn sacrificed, but the sacrifice of a Pawn involved by the text-move is doubtless incorrect.} 5... Qxd4 6. Bd3 {The alternative 6. Nc3 Bxc3 7. bxc3 Qe4+ followed by Nf6 etc. was hardly more attractive.} 6... Bxd2 7. Qxd2 Qd8 {7...Qd8? The refusal to take the b2 pawn is based on a total misappreciation of the position: for after the retreat adopted White has the opportunity to get his King into security and gain a tempo, thus obtaining an advantage in development amply compensating him for the slight material inferiority. By 7. ... Qxb2 8. Rd1 Nd7 Black on the contrary would have reasonable hopes, by careful play, of taking full advantage of his two extra Pawns.} 8. O-O-O Qe7 {If immediately 8. ... Nf6 then 9. Bb5+.} 9. Nf3 Nf6 10. Rh1e1 {It was by no means easy to decide whether this rapid mobilisation of all forces available was stronger than 10. Ng3 with the eventual threat of Rhe1 followed by Nf5. Both plans had their advantages, but the one adopted appeared to be the more simple one.} 10... Nxe4 11. Rxe4 Nd7 12. Rg4! {In order to induce Black either to Castle -- in which case White would play 13. Re1 threatening Qh6 -- or, as in the actual game, to weaken his Pawn position.} 12... f5 13. Rf4 {Threatening 14. Bxf5, etc.} 13... Nf6 14. Re1 Bd7 {14...Bd7? As Black's position will remain inferior anyhow he should try to keep at least his material advantage as long as possible. The natural defensive move 14. ... g6 was therefore also the best. White would in that case continue his attack by 15. h3 followed by g4.} 15. Rxf5 O-O-O 16. Ra5 {As the other pieces are not prepared to support a Q-side attack this Rook had better remain in the middle. The simple 16 Rfe5 would enable White to institute an easy attack against the backward KP.} 16... Kb8 17. Ne5 Be8 18. g3 {18. g3! White realises that a direct attack has no serious chances of success (if for instance 18 Qe3 then simply 18. ... b6 followed by Nd5) so decides to exchange Queens, after which the exploitation of the weakness at e6 may bring some success.} 18... Nd5 19. Re4 {White does not prevent 19. ... Nb4 by 19. a3 as he needs that square for his Rook.} 19... Nb6 20. Qe3 {Threatening 21. Nc4.} 20... Rd5 21. Ra3 Qc5 {Otherwise 22. c4.} 22. Qxc5 Rxc5 23. f4 {Threatening 24. c4 which at this moment would be ineffective because of 23. ... Nd7.} 23... Rd5 {It is not hard to understand that Black tries to avoid the variation 23. ... h6 24. c4 a5 25. Rd4 Bc6 26. Rc3 eventually followed by b3, a3 and b4, but the move in the text loses another Pawn without improving his position.} 24. Nf3! Bd7 25. Ng5 Re8 {Both Pawns could not be protected but by leaving the KRP Black hopes to have the opportunity of playing e5 which would relieve him of one of his main troubles. The object of White's next moves is to prevent this possibility.} 26. c4 Rf5 27. Rd4 Rff8 28. c5 {Not immediately 28 Bxh7 because of 28. ... e5.} 28... Nd5 29. Bxh7 Bc6 30. Bg6 Re7 31. Nf3 {From now on White's plan is rather obvious. He tries to place his pieces in the best possible positions in order to support the advance of his K-side Pawns, which sooner or later will becom decisive.} 31... Nf6 32. Ne5 Bd5 {The control of the square d5 is certainly not a sufficient compensation for White's material advantage.} 33. Re3 Rh8 34. h4 c6 35. Bc2 Rd8 36. Bb3 Rc7 37. Nf3 {More correct was at once 37. Bc4.} 37... Re8 38. Ne5 R8c8 39. Bc4 {It was important to have the possibility of playing b4 in case of ... b6.} 39... Ka8 40. b4 Rb8 41. g4 {The beginning of the end. The tactical justification of this move is shown by the variation: 41. ... Bxc4 42. Nxc4 Nxg4 43. Nb6+ followed by 44 Ra3#.} 41... b6 42. g5 bxc5 43. bxc5 Nd7 44. Nxd7 Rxd7 45. h5 Rf7 {If 45. ... Rdb7 then 46. Bb3, etc.} 46. Rxe6 {One of the combinations that an experienced player does not need to calculate to a finish. He _knows_ that under given circumstances the King-side Pawns must become overwhelming.} 46... Bxe6 47. Bxe6 Rfb7 48. Bb3 Re8 {Also to 48. ... Rb4 the answer would be the same.} 49. h6 gxh6 50. g6 Rg7 {Or 50. ... Rf8 51. f5 Rxf5 52. Re8+ followed by the exchange of Rooks and by g7.} 51. f5 Rf8 52. Bc2 a5 53. Rd6 Re7 54. f6 Re1+ 55. Kd2 Rf1 56. f7 a4 57. Rd7 1-0 [Event "Nottingham Tournament"] [Site "Nottingham England"] [Date "1936.08.10"] [Round "1"] [White "Tartakover, Saviely"] [Black "Capablanca, Jose Raoul"] [PlyCount "37"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] 1. d4 d5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Bg5 {A harmless move which could also be quite well answered by 3... Bf5.} 3... e6 4. e3 c5 5. c3 Be7 6. Nbd2 Nbd7 7. Bd3 O-O 8. O-O Qc7 {As 9.Ne5 would not be in White's favour after 9... Nxe5 10. dex5 Nd7 etc., Black had better play at once 8... b6 and if 9. e4 then 9... dxe4 10. Nxe4 Bb7 etc. as in the actual game.} 9. Qe2 {If white intended to play e4, he should do that at once. After 9... dxe4 10. Nxe4 b6 11. Qc2 h6 12. Bh4 followed by Bg3 the black Queen would have no suitable square. After the text move Black finishes his development and White has not the slightest chance to get an advantage.} 9... b6 10. e4 dxe4 11. Nxe4 Bb7 12. dxc5 Nxc5 13. Nxc5 Qxc5 14. Bxf6 {White -- it is obvious now -- only plays for a draw. Under these conditions it is generally difficult for the second player to complicate matters without taking chances.} 14... Bxf6 15. Be4 Bxe4 16. Qxe4 Qb5 {16. Qb5! Practically dislodges the White Queen from her central position.} 17. Qc2 Rfd8 18. Rfd1 g6 19. h3 1/2-1/2 {In this kind of position the Bishop is worth more than the Knight, which has not any permanent square in the middle. Further play, beginning for instance 19... Rac8 was therefore still possible. Against a player of Dr. Tartakover's experience, however, it is doubtful if it would prove successful.} [Event "Nottingham Tournament"] [Site "Nottingham England"] [Date "1936.08.10"] [Round "1"] [White "Bogoljuboff, Efim"] [Black "Tylor, Sir Theodore Henry"] [PlyCount "117"] [Result "1-0"] 1. Nf3 Nf6 2. c4 c6 3. d4 d5 4. e3 Bf5 5. cxd5 Nxd5 {More aggressive, but also more risky than the usual 5... cxd5, which is good enough for equality.} 6. Bc4 e6 7. O-O Be7 8. Nbd2 Nb6 {A good idea as e4 (in the near future) would only weaken White's central position owing to the position of the Knight at d2.} 9. Be2 O-O 10. Ne5 {10. Ne5? What is the use of placing this Knight only to exchange it at the next move? Comparatively better was 10. Nb3 N8d7 11. Bd2 etc.} 10... N8d7 11. Nxd7 Qxd7 12. Nb3 Rad8 13. Bf3 {Wasting time again instead of developing the other Bishop.} 13... e5 {13...e5! } 14. a4 {Or dxe5 Qc7 followed by Qxe5 with obvious advantage.} 14... e4 15. Be2 Bd6 {Black has now good prospects of obtaining a dangerous King-side attack.} 16. Bd2 {At last.} 16... Qe7 {In order to succeed with his attack Black needed here as many pieces as he could possibly utilise, therefore he should not allow the exchange of his Knight, which posted at d5 would greatly contribute to the final assault. 16... Nd5 was the right move.} 17. Ba5 Qh4 {The combination inaugarated by this move is ingenious but finally leads only to a drawish position. The immediate 17... Qg5 (threatening Bh3) 18. Qc2 Rfe8 followed by Re6 etc. would put before White a more difficult defensive problem.} 18. g3 Qg5 19. Qc2 h5 20. Nc5 {White arrives just in time to exchange the most dangerous Black pieces.} 20... h4 21. Bxb6 axb6 {Insufficient would be 21... hxg3 22. Bxd8 etc.} 22. Nxe4 hxg3 23. hxg3 Bxe4 {If 23... Qg6 then 24 Bd3 threatening Ng6+ etc.} 24. Qxe4 Bxg3 {This had to be calculated many moves before. After 25. fxg3 Qxg3+ 26. Qg2 Qxe3+ Black would either give perpetual check or win a third pawn for the piece, still keeping an attacking position. Consequently White has nothing better than to exchange Queens.} 25. Qg2 Bh4 26. Qxg5 Bxg5 27. b4 {In order to avoid a further simplification by ... c5. Although White has a slightly better Pawn conformation, the opposite coloured Bishops should secure Black an easy draw.} 27... f5 {As White can prevent the further advance of this Pawn it had better remain at his original place. A safe plan was to occupy the open h file by 27... g6 followed by Kg7 and Rh8.} 28. f4 Be7 29. Bc4+ Kh7 30. b5 g5 {Black seems to simplify at all costs. Safer moves here were 30 ... c5 (31. d5 being perfectly harmless) or even 30 ... Rc8.} 31. Kf2 {31. Kf2! } 31... Kg6 {Of course not gxf4 because of 32 Rh1+, and wins, but 31... Rd6 was still simpler.} 32. bxc6 bxc6 33. Rab1 Rb8 34. Rh1 Bf6 {In spite of White's desparate winning attempts Black is holding his own. He could even play here 34... g4 35. Rh2 Bf6 etc. with quite sufficient defence.} 35. fxg5 Bxg5 36. Rh3 b5 {36...b5! Black realises that the exchange of one pair of Rooks will destroy the last of his opponent's winning illusions and is willing to sacrifice a Pawn to obtain the result.} 37. axb5 cxb5 38. Bd3 {If 38. Bxb5 R77 39. Rhh1 Rfb7 with an easy draw.} 38... Rfd8 39. Ke2 Rd5 40. Rf1 Ra8 41. Bb1 Re8 42. R3f3 {Allowing a further exchange and hoping for a miracle.} 42... Rxd4 43. Bxf5+ Kh5 {43...Kh5? More exact was 43... Kh6 in order to answer 44 Rg1 by Rf4! etc.} 44. Rg1 Rxe3+ {44...Rxe3+? Black underestimates the danger of the following situation in which not only will his King occupy one of the worst possible positions but also his Pawn will limit the defensive power of his Rook. He could still obtain a draw by playing 44... Rh4 45. Rg3 Rg8 etc.} 45. Rxe3 Bxe3 46. Kxe3 Rc4 47. Be4 Kh6 48. Kf4 Rc8 {48...Rc8? Instead 48... Ra4 49. Rg6+ Kh7 etc. offered a steadier defence.} 49. Rg6+ Kh5 50. Rg7 Rh8 51. Rg5+ Kh6 52. Rg6+ Kh5 53. Bf5 Rd8 54. Rg5+ Kh6 55. Rg6+ Kh5 56. Ra6 Rg8 {Or 56... Rd4+ 57. Be4 Ra4 58. Rd6 Rc4 59. Rd7 and wins.} 57. Ra1 Kh6 58. Ra7 Rg7 59. Ra6+ 1-0 {As White will force the mate by Ra1 etc.} [Event "Nottingham Tournament"] [Site "Nottingham England"] [Date "1936.08.10"] [Round "1"] [White "Alexander, Conel Hugh O'Donel"] [Black "Botvinnik, Mikhail"] [PlyCount "70"] [Result "0-1"] 1. e4 c5 2. Nc3 Nc6 3. g3 {Quite a harmless variation, which offers Black many good possibilities of defence.} 3... g6 4. Bg2 Bg7 5. Nge2 e6 {Black having already the control upon d4 protects d5, thus obtaining a certain advantage in the middle. A promising strategy which could be successfully met only by very energetic play.} 6. d3 Nge7 7. O-O {7. O-O? Too indiferent, he should make a demonstration on the King-side by 7. h4 and 8. Bg5; if 7... h6 then 8. Bf4 followed by Qd2 and Black would have more difficulties in completing his mobilisation than in the actual game.} 7... O-O 8. Be3 {And here 8. Bg5 or Bf4 was better. White should leave himself the possibility of taking the intruding Knight at d4 with his own Knight.} 8... Nd4 9. Qd2 d5 10. Nf4 {Comparitively better was 10. Nd1 in order to dislodge, as rapidly as possible, the powerful Knight.} 10... dxe4 11. dxe4 Qc7 12. Rad1 {Other methods like 12. Rfc1 followed by Qd1 would have their inconveniences too. The game is already very difficult to defend.} 12... Rd8 13. Qc1 b6 14. Rfe1 Ba6 15. Kh1 {15. Kh1? This move, and not the next one as was generally suggested, is the decisive mistake. White's last chance of salvation consisted in 15. Nb1 with the intention of 16. c3 and if 15... g5 16. Nd3 h6 then 17. f4 with some kind of counter-play. After the King's move the game is strategically hopeless.} 15... Nec6 16. Nce2 {Only shortens the end. The threats 16... Ne5 or eventually (in case of 16 Ng1 for instance) 16... Nb4 were too strong.} 16... Nxe2 17. Rxd8+ Rxd8 18. Nxe2 Bxe2 19. Rxe2 Bxb2 {19...Bxb2! } 20. Qxb2 Rd1+ 21. Bf1 Rxf1+ 22. Kg2 Rd1 23. Rd2 Rxd2 24. Bxd2 Qe5 {24...Qe5! Forcing an end-game in which besides the extra Pawn he will possess a powerful Knight against an anemic Bishop.} 25. Qxe5 Nxe5 26. Bc3 f6 27. Bxe5 {One has the impression that White is anxious to finish the game as rapidly as possible; the Pawn end-game does not offer, of course, any chance.} 27... fxe5 28. a4 Kf7 29. Kf3 c4 30. Ke3 Ke7 31. f4 Kd6 32. c3 Kc5 33. fxe5 b5 34. axb5 Kxb5 35. Kd2 Ka5 36. 0-1 [Event "Nottingham Tournament"] [Site "Nottingham England"] [Date "1936.08.10"] [Round "1"] [White "Winter, William"] [Black "Thomas, Bart., Sir George"] [PlyCount "58"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bg5 Be7 5. e3 Nbd7 6. Nf3 {White can avoid the following simplification by playing 6. Rc1 c6 7. Bd3 but this is hardly necessary, for in the following end-game the chances of the first player will be better on account of the greater freedom in the centre and the open b file.} 6... Ne4 7. Bxe7 Qxe7 8. Qc2 c6 9. Nxe4 dxe4 10. Qxe4 Qb4+ 11. Nd2 Qxb2 12. Qb1 {After 12. Rb1, Black would do better not to take the Rook Pawn because of the possible attack commencing by Bd3, Ke2 etc. but play 12... Qc3 after which White could hardly avoid the exchange of Queens.} 12... Qc3 {Black prefers to delay the exchange for one move in order to have the opponent's Rook at c1 and not at b1.} 13. Qc1 Qxc1+ 14. Rxc1 c5 {After 14... e5 15. Nf3 the opening of the King file would be in White's favour.} 15. g3 {A good idea, as the Bishop will have excellent prospects on the long diagonal. Still in the following White omits to take full profit of this positional advantage.} 15... Ke7 16. Bg2 Rd8 17. Ke2 {Here was, for instance, the right moment to force by 17. Nb3 the Pawn exchange in the middle, as after 17... cxd4 18. exd4 White could not even Castle in order to occupy propmtly the central files with his Rooks. After the move selected Black succeeds through accurate defence in avoiding further trouble.} 17... Rb8 {Now he will be able to answer Nb3 with b6.} 18. Rc3 {Rather surprising, but well calculated. Black has just time to develop his Bishop.} 18... cxd4 19. exd4 Nf6 20. Nf3 Bd7 21. Ne5 Be8 22. Ke3 Nd7 23. Ra3 {No more promising was 23. f4 f6 etc.} 23... Nxe5 24. dxe5 a6 25. Rb1 {White's last hope to gain some advantage but the following move destroys such illusions.} 25... b5 {Forcing a speedy liquidation.} 26. Rxa6 bxc4 27. Ra7+ Kf8 28. Rxb8 Rxb8 29. Rc7 Rb2 1/2-1/2 [Event "Nottingham Tournament"] [Site "Nottingham England"] [Date "1936.08.10"] [Round "1"] [White "Euwe, Dr. Machgielis"] [Black "Reshevsky, Samuel"] [PlyCount "97"] [Result "1-0"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Bb7 5. Bg2 Bb4+ 6. Bd2 Bxd2+ 7. Qxd2 O-O {Not the best, as it allows White to gain control of the important square e5. First 7... d6 and only after 8. O-O was O-O indicated.} 8. Nc3 d6 {8... Ne4 9. Qc2 Nxc3 would lead after Ng5 to the loss of the Exchange. Although in the two match games played with this variation between Dr. Euwe and Capablanca Black succeeded in making a draw, White's advantage was quite evident; the experiment starting with 8... Ne4 is therefore certainly not to be recommended.} 9. Qc2 Qe7 {In order to play c5, which would be premature here because of 10. d5 exd5 11. Nh4 etc.} 10. O-O c5 11. Rad1 {After the exchange of Bishops Black would not have much trouble protecting his weakness, d6. More promising and in accordance with the previous moves was 11. e4.} 11... cxd4 12. Nxd4 Bxg2 13. Kxg2 Rc8 {An important tempo, as White cannot protect his Pawn by 14. b3 on account of 14... d5 etc.} 14. Qd3 Nbd7? {An artificial move that turns to White's advantage. The simple 14... Nc6 was good enough for a draw.} 15. Nf3! Ne5 {Instead of defending the Pawn by Ne8. he prefers to enter into an end-game in which White has the distinct advantage of the Pawn majority on the Queen-side. Although both alternatives were probably good enough to save the game, the former was doubtless the safer.} 16. Nxe5 dxe5 17. Qf3 {17. Qf3! This very important move was probably overlooked by Black who is thereby deprived of one of this centre chances, the control of the diagonal a8-h1.} 17... Rab8 18. b3 a6 19. Ne4 Nxe4 {There is nothing better as 19... Ne8 (with the intention f5) could be answered by 20. g4.} 20. Qxe4 b5 21. cxb5 Rxb5 22. Rc1 Rbc5 23. Rxc5 Qxc5 24. Rd1 Qb5 {24...Qb5? Why not simply 24... f5 25. Qb7 Qc6+ 26. Qxc6 Rxc6 etc. ? If then 27. Rd7 Rc2 with a sufficient counterattack, and by other moves the Black King will approach the centre. The Rook end-game should not be won by White.} 25. Rc1 Rd8 {Better at once 25... Rf8.} 26. Rc7 g6 27. Qf3 Rf8 28. Ra7 a5 29. Qd3 {29. Qd3? Both players produce inexact chess. Here for instance 29. Qc3 was the natural maove in order to exchange the King Pawn against the Queen Rook Pawn and obtain (as in the actual game, but in a forceful way) two connected passed Pawns.} 29... Qc5 30. Ra6 Qb4 31. Ra7 Qc5 32. Qe3 Qd5+ 33. Kh3 {33. Kh3? The only winning chance was 33. f3. After the text move Black should obtain an easy draw.} 33... h5 34. Qc3 Qd1 {It is extraordinary that such a specialist in "Skittle-Chess" as Reshevsky could overlook, even though very short of time, the excellent chance of Qh1! After 35. Qf3 (best) Qf1+ 36. Kh4 e4! White would have to play the correct moves in order not to find himself in trouble, the most convincing drawing possibility would be then 37. Qe3 Qg2 38. Kg5 Qxh2 39. Kf6 h4! 40. Qc5 (threatens mate in two) Re8 41. Rxf7 hxg3 42. Qc7 Qh5+ 43. Kxg6 Qg4+ 44. Kh6 and Black has nothing better than perpetual check.} 35. Kg2 {And now!} 35... Qxe2 36. Rxa5 {Reaching the position he could have attained on his 29th move.} 36... Qe4+ 37. Qf3 Qc2 38. h4? {White did not need to allow the exchange of Rooks. Simpler was 38. Ra7 Qc5 39. Rb7. If then h4 (indicated by Dr. Euwe) 40. h3 Qd4 41. Rb5 threatening Qe3 etc.} 38... Rc8 39. Ra7 Rc7 40. Rxc7 Qxc7 41. Qa8+ {More exact than 41. a4 Qa5 etc.} 41... Kg7 42. a4 Qb6 {42...Qb6? The last mistake, which cannot be explained by lack of time. Correct was 42... Qc3 threatening e4. White could hardly prevent in that case the exchange of one of his passed Pawns against Black's King Pawn and the resulting end-game would still be very hard to win.} 43. a5 {The decisive tempo.} 43... Qxb3 44. a6 Qa3 45. a7 e4 {Too late.} 46. Qb8 Qf3+ 47. Kg1 Qd1+ 48. Kh2 Qe2 49. Qe5+ {If now 49... Kh7 then 50. Qf4 attacking also the King Bishop Pawn.} 49... 1-0 [Event "Nottingham Tournament"] [Site "Nottingham England"] [Date "1936.08.10"] [Round "1"] [White "Fine, Reuben"] [Black "Lasker, Emanuel"] [PlyCount "65"] [Result "1-0"] 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. Nc3 Be7 5. e3 O-O 6. Bd3 dxc4 7. Bxc4 c5 8. O-O a6 9. Qe2 b5 10. Bd3 Bb7 {10...Bb7?} 11. dxc5 Bxc5 12. e4 Nbd7 13. Bg5 h6 14. Bh4 b4 {14...b4?} 15. Na4 Be7 16. Rfd1 Nh5 17. Bxe7 Qxe7 18. Rac1 Ndf6 19. g3 a5 20. Nc5 Rfc8 21. Nxb7 Qxb7 22. Ne5 Rxc1 23. Rxc1 Rc8 24. Rxc8+ Qxc8 25. Qc2 Qb7 26. Qc6 Qa7 27. Qc8+ Kh7 28. Nc6 Qc5 29. e5+ g6 30. exf6 Nxf6 31. Qb7 Kg8 32. Be2 Nd5 33. Ne5 1-0